Hillary Clinton, the supposed presumptive Democratic Party
presidential nominee in 2016, has a comedic side heretofore unnoticed. Last month, in an interview intended to
promote her new book, she said that after Bill Clinton left office in 2009, her
family was “dead broke” when they left the White House and that they had
struggled to pay mortgages on their two homes [each valued at more than a
million dollars]. Somehow, she managed
to deliver this humorous line while maintaining a straight face.
Clinton haters, of course, claimed she was serious. Sean Hannity and Laura Ingram, for instance,
of Fox News fame, were sputtering in their outrage. Lighten up people! Of course, she was kidding.
She knew that her husband was going to receive a
presidential pension of $191,000 which
should have mitigated the loss of his presidential salary of $200,000.
There was no doubt that he’d be able to command speaking fees of many
thousands of dollars per speech. Everyone
knew that.
But even some liberals didn’t catch the joke
.
Jeremy Peters, a political correspondent for the New York Times, took her seriously and
reacted defensively. He suggested that
Hillary may have displayed a tin ear when she was comparing her financial
circumstances to the less affluent 99%, but her comments shouldn’t be equated
with Mitt Romney’s 2012 gaffes. After
all, he pointed out, unlike the last GOP nominee, Hilary supports policies
which aid the poor.
TheTimes writer
didn’t specify but he was probably referring to such liberal policies as
minimum wage increases (which depress employment among the poor) and welfare
policies (which foster dependence on government handouts).
No comments:
Post a Comment