One might think so given the reaction to the Republican
National Committee’s recent release of a study of 2012 election results
entitled Growth and Opportunity Project (nickname: autopsy report).
But the fear – or hope – is surely grossly exaggerated
Sure, the vote for president was disappointing, to say
the least. It’s natural for attention on
the right to focus on what went wrong.
But let’s maintain some perspective.
Romney lost by 3 points!
Considering the deficiencies of the candidate – “47%”,
self-deportation, awkward demeanor, etc., it is a wonder that the Republican standard
bearer did as well as he did.
Losing campaigns often target the messenger, not the
message, as being responsible for the outcome.
And usually, the focus is misplaced.
The voters probably did reject the message, but not always, and not in
2012.
Exit polls reflected a basically conservative
electorate. Last fall, a Pew Research
survey showed that the public favored a smaller government over increased
services by 51% - 40%. So “autopsy”
seems somewhat hysterical and over-wrought.
Yes, it would appear that liberals “out-teched” the GOP and were
surprisingly successful in replicating the ’08 coalition of women, minorities
and young voters. But Republicans who
are now aware of the deficiencies aren’t likely to fall short on technology
next time. Nor is it conceivable that
fortune (Hurricane Sandy and Gov. Chris Christie) will smile so warmly on the
Democrats in 2016.
Having a better candidate will not assure victory for the
GOP but that, with other factors, touched upon above should make it much more
likely.
No comments:
Post a Comment