[The various ways in which the term is depicted in the
media is ludicrous! For the more
discreet outlets, the spelling omits a few letters with no doubt left as to how
to fill in the blanks. It’s like
presenting an easy crossword puzzle for the viewer. And then there are the “CNNs” which are
boldly blunt with the sub-heading while the news anchors modestly refuse to
utter the vulgarity.]
But the outrage was quickly supplanted by condemnation of
the substance of the remark. To critics,
it was another example of Donald Trump’s racism. (Anyway, the President’s penchant for “undignified”
pronouncements has long been on display.)
On one level, the President’s comment referred to the
living conditions in certain countries from which some American immigrants come. And since the referenced countries were
non-European, the comments could fairly be considered an expressed preference
for immigrants sharing America’s “Western culture”. In that sense, the President might have been
attacking fashionable multiculturalism.
But the media generally ignored that explanation (which
can be debated on that basis), noting
that the subject countries were
populated by black and brown people. So,
of course, racism was the motivation for what Trump said.
Whether the President is a racist (a much abused term
which used to mean deep prejudice that members of another race are inferior or
worse), I do not know. But it’s not an “of
course” answer. Donald Trump, after all, a former supporter of liberal
candidates and causes used to be in the good graces of New York City’s intelligentsia.
Donald Trump
certainly has flaws as a person – and as our President. But doesn’t his conduct deserve fair
consideration?
Yet the media’s
hatred of the man is so powerful he rarely receives it.
No comments:
Post a Comment