That question invariably arises when a fellow lawyer
learns that I am a political conservative.
The unspoken assumption behind the question is that a person who defends
those accused of crimes must be in some sense partial to them or, at the very
least, suspicious of the police who made one’s client a defendant. In other words, one who represents those
accused of crimes is expected to be leery of law enforcers, maybe not an
anarchist but at least a liberal.
I certainly don’t fall into those categories –at least
not easily.
My succinct response to the questioner is that the Bill
of Rights provides protections for those accused of crimes such
as a trial by jury and the right to remain silent. What could be more conservative than
protecting a client’s constitutional rights?
There is a broad irony to the question posed by fellow
attorneys (most of whom consider themselves proud liberals). Those on the left do, indeed, tend to be
suspicious of the exercise of power by government employees who are in law
enforcement, including prosecutors. They
see such personnel often as agents of racial prejudice and injustice (the
prejudgment by many on the left of the recent police shooting in Ferguson,
Missouri is an example).
Yet liberals
eagerly urge other arms of the government to get involved in curing perceived
social ills such as income inequality, environmental hazards and health
insurance inefficiencies.
But a conservative does not accept the distinction that those
exercising powers of government are to be viewed suspiciously in some aspects
but embraced in others.
Human nature is a constant in human endeavors. The fact that a person is a “public servant”
who considers himself well-motivated does not grant him an exemption from
reality. The ranks of law enforcement or
social service agencies, for instance, all contain people – a mixture of good,
bad and indifferent.
Power does indeed corrupt. That appreciation is at the heart of
political conservatism and the U.S. Constitution.
Our Framers sought to restrain the exercise of power,
while acknowledging that government is meaningless without it.
The essential role of the criminal defense attorney is to
serve as a check on the exercise of governmental power in the criminal justice
system. Require the state to prove the
validity of its accusations. Provide a
forum and rules to allow the defendant to challenge them. That is the job of the defense attorney. The skilled defender, be he liberal or
otherwise, oblivious as he may be to the fact, is playing a very conservative
role. Our society would be much better
off – and certainly more conservative – if non-law enforcement sections of our
government were subjected to the same degree of scrutiny confronted by those
who accuse others of crimes.
No comments:
Post a Comment