It’s fair to say that most liberals take pride in knowing
that their policies supporting the expansion of government show that they care
about people, unlike callous conservatives.
Yet most also fail to acknowledge – or understand -- that
such displays of “caring” often don’t help – in fact hurt – the objects of
their attention.
Consider the State of Hawaii. Its government promotes welfare policies that
put it alongside California and Massachusetts as places which loudly proclaim
they “care” for less fortunate inhabitants.
In fact, for a state with remarkably low employment (5.3%
vs 7.8% nationally), a surprisingly high percentage of its population is on
food stamps (11% vs 13% nationally) and has more than double the U.S. homeless
rate.
What’s going on?
Is it possible that the very generous welfare policies are encouraging many
to become dependent on government aid?
Is that the result of liberals’ “caring”? A cynic might suggest that that is the plan –
expanding the populace’s dependence upon governmental aid adds to the liberals’
base of support.
But for me, that seems too neat an answer.
From my own experience with liberals, their motivations
are generally good. The calculating and
Machiavellian among them are few. Simply
put, perceiving that one is doing good by offering money or benefits to those
in need shows that one cares. And that
makes liberals feel good. [It may be a
factor that the self-righteousness comes not from one’s pocket but from the taxpaying
benefactors. The cost of feeling good,
therefore, can be free.]
But what if, as statistics from Hawaii and elsewhere
strongly suggest, such liberal policies are counterproductive in promoting self-sufficiency
and self- respect (certainly good outcomes).
The typical response is denial. It’s as if wanting to do good should be
sufficient. So the well intentioned
liberal tells himself that since he is good, wants to do good, he can only do
good.
Recently, liberal Democratic Congresswoman Colleen Hanabusa
of Hawaii appeared on Bill O’Reilly’s popular Fox News show and was confronted
on the apparent anomaly of the state’s prosperity and its high welfare
rolls. Her response – “it shows we care.”
Like good intentions, “caring” can pave the way to hell.
No comments:
Post a Comment