Saturday, June 24, 2023

Fox Needs to be Less Tolerant of Trump’s Nasty, Divisive Language

 

In the wake of Donald Trump’s generally negative influence on the congressional vote of last year, there was a noticeable reduction in the number of plaudits from Fox News, et al.  Florida’s Ron DeSantis appeared to be the beneficiary.  Although polls reflected a dip in the former president’s Republican base soon thereafter, more recent samplings of party opinion suggest not only a halt to the erosion but even a return to prior levels of majority GOP support.

For those who believe the renomination of Trump would be a Republican and national disaster (TSC firmly included), Fox needs to heighten efforts to thwart his plans.

How?  Besides highlighting the candidacies – announced or otherwise- of competing conservatives, Fox can contribute to a revived weakening of Donald Trump’s support by being less tolerant of his nasty and divisive language which so poisons political discourse.

A good example of how his words should not be treated occurred recently when the black New York City prosecutor then considering Trump’s indictment was called an “animal”.  On one level, the term as applied was silly and reminiscent of a middle school student.  But it was more condemnable when the target was a black person (historically labeled “apes” by many bigots).

A second tier Fox anchor commenting on the statement lamely noted that he wouldn’t have said that but agreed the prosecutor was displaying bias.

Not good enough.  Trump’s remarks were simply not to be tolerated or excused, but rather strongly condemned as being “beyond the pale”.  Standards of acceptable behavior or speech (routinely ignored by Donald Trump) deserve to be re-established.  Pointing out his breach is appropriate and it should be forcefully done.  Maybe such rebuke from a trusted network will serve the conservative cause.

 

Sunday, June 11, 2023

Why Does Donald Trump Remain Popular with So Many Republicans?

 

TSC has never been a fan of Donald Trump.  I’ll admit that I voted for him last time – how could I not, given the alternative.  But my ballot was indeed cast with reluctance.

Personally, I do not like him.  He is not a good person.  He treats people deplorably who refuse t do his bidding or display less than 100% loyalty (a character trait he demands but does not reciprocate).

Yet, there are millions of my fellow Republicans who do not share my disdain for our former President.

Why not?  It’s not as if the deficiencies just recited are concealed.

I suggest that Trump adherents fall into two basic categories.  The first  smaller one, is actually attracted to the former leader’s crude and mean ways.  They are people who are angry- with considerable justification – with the way the Left depicts them (deplorables) and delight that Donald Trump can “dish it out” against them as they would like to.

Other Republicans ignore his manner (unlike the first group) but they really don’t care about politics or focus on Trump’s deficient personal qualities.  Rather, they judge Donald Trump by how they felt when he was president. 

That attitude was best illustrated by a postal worker I know.  She’s plainly middle class in upbringing and friendly and pleasant in manner.  She knew that I was interested in politics and a conservative.  One day recently she asked what I thought of Trump.  I told her of his character flaws.   “I don’t care about those things,” she replied, “but when he was President, I felt safe.  With President Biden, I don’t.”

Millions of good people feel that way. 

The GOP’s task is to nominate a candidate who can foster the same reassurance without the Trump baggage which alienates political independents and others.